Clarence “Frank” Turley v. State of New Mexico

633 P.2d 687 (1981)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Clarence “Frank” Turley v. State of New Mexico

New Mexico Supreme Court
633 P.2d 687 (1981)

KL

Facts

Frank Turley (defendant) was hired by a landowner to use mechanical digging equipment to excavate an archaeological site on the landowner’s property. They signed an agreement stipulating that Turley was to perform excavation duties on behalf of the landowner and that the landowner retained sole ownership over any artifacts recovered. Turley began work, and New Mexico authorities charged him with the criminal offense of excavating an archaeological site on another person’s private property without a permit. New Mexico law required a permit for any excavations, but the law included an exception to the permit requirement for landowners conducting personal excavation of their own land. Holding that Turley’s conduct fell within that exception because he was hired by the landowner to excavate the landowner’s property and was acting as the landowner’s agent, the trial court dismissed the criminal information. On appeal, New Mexico argued that the exception applied only to excavations personally performed by landowners. The appellate court agreed and reversed the trial court’s ruling. Turley appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Easley, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership