Clark v. Arizona Interscholastic Association
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
695 F.2d 1126 (1982)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
A group of male high school students (plaintiffs) filed suit against the Arizona Interscholastic Association (AIA) (defendant) because they were not allowed to participate in their high school volleyball teams, which were girls-only. The AIA did not allow boys to play on girls’ non-contact sports teams to compensate for girls’ historical lack of opportunity in interscholastic sports and to prevent the girls’ displacement from teams. Boys had ample interscholastic athletic opportunities in various other sports, in the past and present. Uncontested evidence showed that high school boys were taller, could jump higher, and were stronger than high school girls and would be better volleyball players than girls on average. Based on these stipulated facts, the district court entered judgment in AIA’s favor. The court found that the AIA’s rules did not violate equal protection and that the maintenance of girls-only volleyball teams was substantially related to the asserted governmental objectives. The male students appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nelson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.