Clark v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
40 B.T.A. 333 (1939), acq. 1957-1 C.B. 4 (1939)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Clark (plaintiff) hired a tax counsel to file his and his wife’s 1932 federal income tax returns. The tax counsel made an error in calculating the Clarks’ deduction. One of the results of the error was that the tax counsel advised Clark and his wife to file a joint tax return. Clark did so, and based on that tax return paid the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) over $30,000 in income taxes for 1932. If Clark and his wife had filed separate tax returns, their total tax liability would have been $19,941.10 less. The tax counsel paid Clark $19,941.10 to cover the difference resulting from the error. The IRS included that $19,941.10 in the Clark’s 1934 income tax liability. Clark appealed to the board of tax appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Leech, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.