Clark v. Foust-Graham

615 S.E.2d 398 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Clark v. Foust-Graham

North Carolina Court of Appeals
615 S.E.2d 398 (2005)

Facts

Wesley Foust-Graham (defendant) and James Lester Goodwin married on April 12, 2002, when Foust-Graham was 40 years old and Goodwin was 80. Kelly Clark (plaintiff), Goodwin’s adult daughter, filed an action as Goodwin’s guardian ad litem to annul the marriage on the grounds of incompetency, lack of consent, undue influence, and impotence. After Goodwin died on October 23, 2003, Clark filed a motion to substitute herself as an executrix of Goodwin’s estate and beneficiary entitled to take under his will. The trial court permitted Clark to become an executrix of Goodwin’s estate but denied her motion to be substituted as a beneficiary to Goodwin’s will. At trial, Clark presented evidence and testimony that Goodwin was exhibiting signs of Stage II dementia and Alzheimer’s disease and that Goodwin would have gone along with Foust-Graham’s sexual advances. Foust-Graham presented evidence that Goodwin freely consented to marriage and she and Goodwin successfully engaged in sexual intercourse during the marriage. The jury found that Foust-Graham procured the marriage to Goodwin by exerting undue influence upon him. Foust-Graham appealed to the North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McCullough, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership