From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Clark v. Kmart Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
634 N.W.2d 347 (2001)
In October 1994, Annie Clark (plaintiff) visited a department store owned by Kmart Corporation (Kmart) (defendant). As Clark walked through a closed checkout lane to enter the store, Clark slipped on several loose grapes scattered throughout the lane, injuring herself during the fall. Clark’s husband testified that the grapes had already been stepped on prior to Clark’s fall. Clark brought a negligence suit against Kmart, and at trial, a jury returned a verdict in Clark’s favor. Kmart’s motion for a directed verdict was denied, and Kmart appealed. The court of appeals reversed the trial court’s decision, holding that Kmart was entitled to a directed verdict because Clark had provided insufficient evidence that Kmart should have been on notice of the grapes. Clark appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.