Clark v. United States
United States Supreme Court
95 U.S. 539 (1877)

- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Clark (plaintiff) entered into an oral agreement with an officer in the United States (defendant) military, specifically the Quartermaster’s Department. Under the agreement, the military was to use Clark’s steamship on a trial trip and then, upon return, enter into a written agreement for the military to rent the steamship at a price of $150 per day. Also, the oral agreement included that the military would pay for the expenses of the trial trip and would be responsible for any losses that occurred during the trip. Clark delivered the steamship, and the military sent it out with a military crew on the trial trip. The steamship was lost during that trip, and Clark filed a claim seeking to recover the value of the ship. The United States denied the claim because federal law required such contracts to be in writing, and the court of claims dismissed the case. Clark appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bradley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.