Clark v. Universal Builders, Inc.

501 F.2d 324 (1974)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Clark v. Universal Builders, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
501 F.2d 324 (1974)

Facts

A group of Black citizens (buyers) (plaintiffs) who bought new homes in Chicago from Universal Builders, Inc., and other sellers (sellers)(defendants), filed a class-action lawsuit against the sellers pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1982. The buyers alleged that pervasive racial discrimination had resulted in a dual housing market in Chicago, with one market for White homebuyers and one market for Black homebuyers. The buyers further alleged that the sellers had violated the buyers’ statutory and constitutional rights by taking advantage of the dual housing market, selling houses in the smaller, more concentrated Black market at higher prices and with less favorable terms than those available to homebuyers in the White market. A district court judge denied the sellers’ motion to dismiss, reasoning that the buyers had stated a claim pursuant to § 1982. The case was tried before a different district court judge. At trial, the sellers presented expert testimony that dual, racially segregated housing markets existed in Chicago and that Black buyers paid between 20.6 percent and 34.5 percent more than White buyers for similar homes. The buyers’ experts also testified that, despite buyers in the Black and White markets having similar levels of creditworthiness, the sellers refused to allow deed and mortgage transactions with Black buyers. Instead, the sellers offered only land-installment contracts, sometimes demanding down payments of 45 percent, so that they could charge exorbitant prices for new homes. At the close of the buyers’ case, the district court entered a directed verdict for the sellers, reasoning that the sellers sold only homes in the Black market and that the buyers therefore had not stated a § 1982 claim because they had offered no evidence that the sellers had sold property to White homebuyers at more favorable terms than they had offered to Black homebuyers. The buyers appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Swygert, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership