Clearfield Bank and Trust Co. v. Omega Financial Corp.
United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
65 F. Supp. 2d 325, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 90,655 (1999)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
A limited number of local shareholders owned all the unregistered stock of Clearfield Bank and Trust Company (Clearfield) (plaintiff). Omega Financial Corporation (Omega) (defendant) sent those shareholders letters that expressed interest in buying their shares. Omega followed up by holding a shareholders’ meeting and distributing sales agreements, which many shareholders signed. Omega scheduled a second shareholders’ meeting, at which Omega planned to solicit additional stock purchases. Clearfield sued Omega and petitioned for injunctive relief, alleging that Omega’s letters and agreements constituted tender offers that contained misstatements and omissions of material fact that violated § 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), as added by the Williams Act. Omega argued that the Williams Act did not apply to privately negotiated intrastate transactions involving unregistered stock.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.