Clem Perrin Marine Towing, Inc. v. Panama Canal Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
730 F.2d 186 (1984)
- Written by Tom Syverson, JD
Facts
Clem Perrin Marine Towing, Inc. (Clem) (plaintiff) owned a boat that was encumbered by two mortgages. Clem leased the boat to Panama Canal Co. (Panama) (defendant). The lease agreement included an option to purchase the boat at the end of the lease. After Panama signed the lease agreement, Clem took out a third mortgage on the boat. Clem then fell behind on payments on the first mortgage. A person involved in brokering the transaction between Clem and Panama notified Panama that Clem had stopped paying the first mortgage. Panama contacted Clem, requesting Clem’s assurance that Clem could provide clear title to the boat when the lease-purchase option became exercisable. Panama withheld further lease payments pending Clem’s assurance. Instead of responding with an assurance, Clem sued Panama for the withheld lease payment. A few months later, the holders of the first and second mortgages gave notice of foreclosure, and Panama purchased those mortgages. Panama counterclaimed for damages, arguing that Clem breached the agreement by failing to provide clear title to the boat. The district court held that Panama breached the lease agreement, and Panama appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Higginbotham, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.