Clemons v. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 1 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Clemons v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
23 Vet. App. 1 (2009)

Facts

William Clemons (plaintiff) served in the United States Navy from 1951 to 1958. His service included firing guns at the enemy, and contact with the bodies of deceased American servicemen, during the Korean War. His service medical records showed that he was treated for anxiety during his service. In 2002, Clemons filed a claim with the Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA) (defendant) for benefits for a psychiatric disorder, which he self-identified as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). VA medical examinations found that Clemons suffered from a schizoid personality disorder and an anxiety disorder with PTSD features. The VA denied his claim, and Clemons appealed to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board). The board upheld the denial, finding that the record did not confirm a diagnosis of PTSD, but rather that Clemons had a different psychiatric disorder. The board failed to consider the nature or symptomology, or the possibility of any service connection, for this psychiatric disorder. Clemons appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership