Cleveland Golden Gloves Association, Inc. v. United States

2000 WL 172776 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cleveland Golden Gloves Association, Inc. v. United States

United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
2000 WL 172776 (2000)

Facts

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) violated its own rules by issuing a third-party summons to the attorney for the Cleveland Golden Gloves Association, Inc. (GG) (plaintiff) without notifying GG. On Match 24, 2000, GG filed a motion to quash the summons. On June 2, the United States (defendant) notified GG that it had withdrawn the summons. GG nevertheless did not withdraw its motion to quash, and on June 26, the United States moved to dismiss GG’s motion to quash on mootness grounds. The district court granted the United States’ motion on July 5. GG then moved for the award of attorney’s fees pursuant to Internal Revenue Code (code) § 7430, claiming that it was the prevailing party because the United States withdrew the summons. The United States responded that it met its burden of showing that its position was substantially justified because it was reasonable for the United States to withdraw the summons before answering GG’s complaint. Additionally, the United States argued that GG’s attorney’s-fees motion was frivolous and asked the court to impose sanctions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Malley, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 833,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership