Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Cleveland v. McNabb

312 F. Supp. 155 (1970)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Cleveland v. McNabb

United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee

312 F. Supp. 155 (1970)

Facts

Dr. W. B. Cleveland and Katherine Cleveland (plaintiffs) leased their land in Tennessee to Jack McNabb (defendant), where McNabb grew cotton. McNabb delivered the cotton to a cotton gin, which issued tickets for the cotton that noted the cotton had been grown on the Clevelands’ land. After ginning, the cotton was taken directly to a warehouse, which issued negotiable warehouse receipts for each bale of cotton that the warehouse held. The receipts referred to certain cotton-gin tickets and listed McNabb as the producer. McNabb provided these warehouse receipts to a local United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) office in exchange for a loan. USDA regulations required that the cotton going into the loan program be lien-free. McNabb told the clerk at the local USDA office that there was no lien on the cotton, and the clerk did not ask where McNabb had grown the cotton or whether the cotton had been grown on leased land. The loan papers stated that there was no lien on the cotton. A copy of McNabb’s lease was on file in the local USDA office. Under the terms of the loan, when the loan was not repaid, the cotton became the property of the United States. The Clevelands sued McNabb for unpaid rent under the lease and also sued the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) (defendant), a branch of the USDA, to enforce the landlord’s lien held by the Clevelands against the cotton acquired by the CCC.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brown, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership