Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.

526 U.S. 795 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.

United States Supreme Court
526 U.S. 795 (1999)

  • Written by Nicole Gray , JD

Facts

Carolyn Cleveland (plaintiff) was awarded Social Security disability insurance (SSDI) benefits after she had a stroke and lost her job. Before she was fired, Cleveland asked her employer to accommodate her disability by providing her with additional training or with extra time to complete her assignments. The employer denied Cleveland’s request, and one week before she was awarded SSDI benefits, Cleveland filed suit against her former employer in a United States district court. There, Cleveland alleged that the employer fired her without reasonably accommodating her disability in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). To sustain her ADA claim, Cleveland asserted that she could perform the essential functions of her job with reasonable accommodations. The district court did not decide the case on the merits. Instead, the court granted summary judgment in favor of Policy Management Systems Corp. (defendant) after concluding that Cleveland was estopped from proving her ADA claim that she could perform the essential functions of her former job. The court based its conclusion on the fact that Cleveland was awarded SSDI benefits based on a claim that she was totally disabled. A court of appeals upheld the summary judgment, finding that application of the two laws presented a factual conflict. Cleveland filed a petition for writ of certiorari for a determination of whether receipt of SSDI benefits estops the recipient from simultaneously pursuing an ADA claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership