Clevenger v. Moore

259 P. 219 (1927)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Clevenger v. Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
259 P. 219 (1927)

Facts

Clevenger (plaintiff) owned a building in Bartlesville, Oklahama, and was asked by Peay if she would trade the property for an apartment building in Tulsa owned by J.D. Simmons. Clevenger executed a deed and gave it to Peay to hold in escrow until she had inspected the apartment building. Clevenger did not approve the trade after inspecting the apartment building. Clevenger left Bartlesville for about a month and returned to find that the deed she executed had been recorded by J.D. Simmons. Simmons had executed a second deed conveying Clevenger’s property to Moore (defendant). Clevenger brought suit to reclaim possession of the property and rescind her deed to Simmons and Simmons’ deed to Moore. The trial court granted Moore’s motion to dismiss Clevenger’s complaint on grounds that it failed to state a claim for which relief could be granted. Clevenger appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Diffendaffer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership