Clifton v. Commonwealth

468 S.E.2d 155 (1996)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Clifton v. Commonwealth

Virginia Court of Appeals
468 S.E.2d 155 (1996)

Facts

Roger Clifton (defendant) went to his next-door neighbor’s house one morning when his neighbor’s children were asleep and her husband was away at work. Clifton entered the house and raped the woman. She testified that she told Clifton to stop and started crying but did not struggle or resist because she was afraid for her children and did not want them to be awakened during the rape. After Clifton left the house and her husband returned home, the woman called the police. Clifton was charged with rape. Clifton admitted to having had sexual intercourse with the woman that morning but claimed that the encounter was entirely consensual. There was no other evidence presented beyond Clifton and the woman’s conflicting testimony regarding the woman’s consent or lack thereof. The jury was instructed that it could not convict Clifton of rape if the victim consented to the sexual intercourse. Clifton was convicted. Clifton appealed, alleging that the court should have instructed the jury that the prosecution was required to prove that he in fact knew or should have known that the victim did not consent.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Willis, J.)

Dissent (Benton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership