Clinic & Hospital Inc. v. McConnell

241 Mo. App. 223 (1951)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Clinic & Hospital Inc. v. McConnell

Missouri Court of Appeals
241 Mo. App. 223 (1951)

Facts

Richard McConnell and others (collectively, the Tune In operators) (defendants) operated Tune In, a music shop. From 8:00 or 9:00 a.m. until at least 7:00 or 8:00 p.m., the Tune In operators played music on a record player and broadcast it to the surrounding area with a loudspeaker. Clinic & Hospital Inc. (the hospital) (plaintiff) operated a nearby hospital and clinic. Tune In’s music was audible within the hospital and clinic rooms, disturbing patients. Patients often needed sedatives, suffered worsening of their conditions, and left the hospital early because of the music. Tune In’s music was unusual for the area and was substantially louder than the noises from other businesses and residents in the area. Although staff from the hospital asked the Tune In operators to lower the volume of the music, explaining the harm to the patients, the Tune In operators continued to loudly broadcast the music. The hospital filed suit against the Tune In operators, alleging that Tune In’s music was a nuisance and seeking an injunction against further broadcasting of music. The trial court denied the hospital’s request for an injunction, and the hospital appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bour, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership