Clinton v. City of New York
United States Supreme Court
524 U.S. 417, 118 S.Ct. 2091, 141 L.Ed.2d 393 (1998)
- Written by Susie Cowen, JD
Facts
The Line Item Veto Act (Act) gave the President the power to “cancel in whole” three types of provisions signed into law. Specifically, the Act allowed for the cancellation of (1) any dollar amount of discretionary budget authority; (2) any item of new direct spending; or (3) any limited tax benefit. The effect of the cancellation was the prevention of the item from having any legal force or effect. President Clinton (defendant) invoked the Act to cancel a provision in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 that would have allowed New York to avoid repaying funds received under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. Individuals who would have benefitted under those provisions of the Social Security Act (plaintiffs) challenged the cancellation. The district court found that the Act was unconstitutional. The case came before the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
