Clomon v. Jackson
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
988 F.2d 1314 (1993)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
Philip D. Jackson (defendant) was an attorney who worked part-time as the general counsel of NCB Collection Services (NCB), a collection agency. NCB used a mass-mailing system to send debt-collection letters to a million people each year. The mass-mailing system imported debtor information from databases and printed letters without any NCB employees reviewing the letters or the files of the debtors. The letterhead and signature lines of the letters included Jackson’s name and position as NCB’s general counsel and contained statements indicating that Jackson had made decisions specifically related to the recipient’s case. Jackson approved the form letters sent by NCB but did not actually review any debtor files or approve or sign any letters. Christ Clomon (plaintiff) received a series of letters from NCB seeking payment for a debt of $9.42. Clomon filed a lawsuit against Jackson in federal district court, alleging that Jackson had violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by authorizing NCB to send the form letters that falsely indicated that Jackson was personally involved in each debt-collection case. Jackson defended his actions, claiming that the letters were accurate because he was an attorney and did send the letters. The district court held that Jackson had violated the FDCPA and awarded Clomon additional damages of $1,000. Jackson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cabranes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.