Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Clouse v. Myers

 Missouri Court of Appeals
753 S.W.2d 316 (1988)


Facts

Patricia Myers (defendant) operated the Green Door tavern. J. Todd Clouse (plaintiff) entered into an agreement with Patricia and her husband, Jerry Myers, titled “Employment/Management Contract.” Under the agreement, the Myerses agreed to hire Clouse to manage the business in exchange for a percentage of the net profits, and Clouse agreed to pay the Myerses $7,500 at the time of signing and an additional $7,500 at a later date. The agreement also provided that if the Myerses caused the loss of the tavern’s liquor license, they would refund any money paid by Clouse. The liquor license for the Green Door was in Patricia’s sole name. When the Missouri Division of Liquor Control learned that Clouse was operating the Green Door without a liquor license, contrary to Missouri law, it notified Patricia that she would need to apply for a license in the names of all of the business’s partners. Patricia instead chose to relinquish the liquor license. Clouse sued the Myerses for misrepresentation and for a refund of the $7,500 he had paid them. The Myerses counterclaimed for the $7,500 still owed to them under the contract. At trial, Clouse testified that he knew the Green Door’s license was in Patricia’s sole name and that the contract was, in fact, a partnership agreement, not an employment contract. Clouse also testified that the reason for labeling the contract an “Employment/Management Contract” was to allow him to operate the tavern under Patricia’s license. The trial court entered a judgment for Clouse on his claims for $7,500 and a judgment against the Myerses on their counterclaim. The Myerses appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Greene, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.