Clyde E. Morgan and Wife, Helen Morgan v. Max Wiser and Ed McClarty
Tennessee Court of Appeals
711 S.W.2d 220, 61 A.L.R.4th 1173 (1985)

- Written by Kelli Lanski, JD
Facts
Max Wister and Ed McClarty (defendants) found a cache of gold coins buried in an iron pot on the property of Clyde and Helen Morgan (plaintiffs). Wister and McClarty used a metal detector to locate the coins and were trespassing on the Morgans’ farm at the time. The Morgans sued, seeking a judgment requiring Wister and McClarty to return the coins or pay damages. The Morgans did not claim to be the original owners of the coins. Wister and McClarty raised the affirmative defense that the law of treasure trove applied to the coins, meaning that their ownership rights as the finders of the coins trumped the rights of anyone but the coins’ true owners. The lower court agreed, holding that common law on treasure trove property stated that the title to found objects belonged to the finder. The Morgans appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cantrell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.