Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Coady v. Harpo, Inc.

Illinois Appellate Court
719 N.E.2d 244 (1999)


Facts

Elizabeth Coady (plaintiff) worked for Harpo, Inc. (defendant) in various positions, including as a producer for The Oprah Winfrey Show. In March 1995, Coady signed a Business Ethics, Objectivity, and Confidentiality Policy (confidentiality agreement), which provided, among other things, that Coady must keep as confidential and never disclose any statements about Winfrey, Harpo, or any of Winfrey’s and Harpo’s confidential information. The agreement defined confidential information to include information about Winfrey’s business and personal life and Harpo’s business affairs. The confidentiality agreement conditioned Coady’s employment with Harpo on her compliance with the confidentiality requirements. Coady resigned from her position with Harpo in March 1998. Coady alleged that she had been constructively terminated because Harpo had taken actions intended to force Coady out of her job. The following month, Harpo wrote Coady a letter reminding her of her obligations under the confidentiality agreement. Harpo stated that it intended to enforce the agreement and ensure Coady’s continuing compliance. Coady filed a declaratory-judgment action against Harpo in Illinois state court, seeking a declaration that the confidentiality agreement was unenforceable. Coady said that she planned to work as a journalist and write or report about her experiences as a Harpo employee because those experiences were matters of legitimate public interest. Coady asserted that the confidentiality agreement was overly broad, not limited in duration or geographical scope, and not reasonably necessary to protect Harpo’s legitimate business interests. Harpo moved to dismiss Coady’s action. The trial court granted Harpo’s motion, and Coady appealed to the Illinois Appellate Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Greiman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial