Coalition for Economic Equity v. Wilson

1996 WL 788376 (1996)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Coalition for Economic Equity v. Wilson

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
1996 WL 788376 (1996)

Facts

The Coalition for Economic Equity (coalition) (plaintiffs) filed a bilateral class-action lawsuit to challenge the validity of a California constitutional provision—Proposition 209—that they alleged was an unlawful attempt to eliminate affirmative-action plans. The coalition brought a motion to certify a defendant class comprised of various state and local government entities and officials that would be bound by Proposition 209 and to appoint the governor, the attorney general, and the president of the University of California as defendant class representatives. A dispute arose concerning the requirement in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(4) that requires that class representatives must fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class, because one group of defendants agreed with the coalition that Proposition 209 was unconstitutional and another group, to which the proposed class representatives belonged, disagreed and believed that the proposition was constitutional. None of the parties disputed that the proposed class representatives were eminently qualified or that they had the resources to fully litigate the case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Henderson, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership