Coastal Leasing Corp. v. T. Bar S Corp.

496 S.E. 2d 795 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Coastal Leasing Corp. v. T. Bar S Corp.

North Carolina Court of Appeals
496 S.E. 2d 795 (1998)

  • Written by Mike Begovic, JD

Facts

Coastal Leasing Corp. (Coastal) (plaintiff) leased a cash register to T. Bar S Corp. (T-Bar) (defendant). The 48-month lease obligated T-Bar to make monthly rental payments of $289.13. The officers of T- Bar personally guaranteed payment. The lease contained a liquidated-damages provision, permitting Coastal to demand full payment of the outstanding amount after a default. The liquidated-damages provision also allowed Coastal to take possession of the cash register after default and sell it at a commercial sale. After 18 months of regular payments, T-Bar defaulted on the lease in December 1993. In February 1994 Coastal sent a letter to T-Bar explaining that it was exercising its right under the lease to demand full payment of the outstanding balance on the lease, which amounted to $8,841.06, and threatened to take possession of the cash register if payment was not made within one week. On March 10, 1994, Coastal mailed a certified letter advising T-Bar that it had taken possession of the cash register and would conduct a public sale on March 23. Coastal conducted a public sale and, because there were no bids for the cash register, was able to buy it for a price of $2,000. Coastal filed suit against T-Bar, seeking to recover the full amount due on the lease, plus attorney’s fees, minus the $2,000 it received from the sale. T-Bar filed an answer and counterclaim. Coastal filed a motion for summary judgment, which went unanswered by T-Bar. Default judgment was awarded to Coastal. After a hearing, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Coastal in the amount of $7,223.56 plus attorney’s fees. T-Bar appealed, arguing that the liquidated-damages clause in the lease was unreasonable under state law and that Coastal conducted the sale of the cash register in an unreasonable manner.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership