Coastal Petroleum v. Chiles
Florida District Court of Appeal
701 So. 2d 619 (1997)

- Written by Solveig Singleton, JD
Facts
The Florida Constitution provided that the lands under its territorial navigable waters were held by the State of Florida (Florida) (defendant) in trust for all the people and that private use of such lands could be authorized only if the use was not against the public interest. The Florida Constitution also provided that the state must compensate owners of private property taken for public use. Before the 1970s, Coastal Petroleum (Coastal) (plaintiff) obtained the right to receive royalties from oil leases on some of the land within Florida’s waters. Florida authorities retained the discretion to grant or refuse to grant such leases. In 1990, Florida passed a statute barring exploration and drilling for oil and gas in certain areas off the Florida coast (the 1990 statute). Some of the areas affected by the 1990 statute included those from which Coastal might have received royalties (affected areas). However, between 1975 and 1990, no one had asked for an oil lease within the affected areas. None of the affected areas’ test wells, drilled before 1976, had found oil. Coastal sued Florida, arguing that the 1990 statute amounted to a taking of its right to royalties, for which Coastal ought to be compensated. The trial court ruled that in enacting the 1990 statute, Florida had merely exercised its authority to protect lands held in trust for the people and ruled against Coastal. Coastal appealed, arguing that even if Florida had acted under the public-trust doctrine, Coastal was still owed compensation.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wolf, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.