Logourl black

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.

United States District Court for the District of Delaware
110 F.R.D. 363 (1986)


Facts

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (Bottlers) (plaintiffs) sued Coca-Cola Co. (Coca-Cola) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and damages. The dispute concerned whether diet Coke was included under the existing Coca-Cola Bottler’s Syrup contracts. The Bottlers asked the court to force Coca-Cola to produce its top-secret soft drink formulae during discovery. The court concluded that the formulae had to be disclosed so that it could fairly determine whether the diet Coke syrup was included and ordered the disclosure under a protective order. Coca-Cola sent a letter to the court that Coca-Cola would not produce its formulae due to the “overriding commercial importance of…secrecy,” but requested a hearing on the question of sanctions. The Bottlers requested that the court strike Coca-Cola’s answer, enter a default judgment in the Bottlers’ favor pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) Rule 37(b)(2)[(A)(ii)], and award costs and attorneys’ fees to the Bottlers. Coca-Cola opposed the Bottlers request and instead suggested that a limited preclusion order should be issued.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Schwartz, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.