Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
110 F.R.D. 363 (1986)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (Bottlers) (plaintiffs) sued Coca-Cola Co. (Coca-Cola) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and damages. The dispute concerned whether diet Coke was included under the existing Coca-Cola Bottler’s Syrup contracts. The Bottlers asked the court to force Coca-Cola to produce its top-secret soft drink formulae during discovery. The court concluded that the formulae had to be disclosed so that it could fairly determine whether the diet Coke syrup was included and ordered the disclosure under a protective order. Coca-Cola sent a letter to the court that Coca-Cola would not produce its formulae due to the “overriding commercial importance of…secrecy,” but requested a hearing on the question of sanctions. The Bottlers requested that the court strike Coca-Cola’s answer, enter a default judgment in the Bottlers’ favor pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) Rule 37(b)(2)[(A)(ii)], and award costs and attorneys’ fees to the Bottlers. Coca-Cola opposed the Bottlers request and instead suggested that a limited preclusion order should be issued.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Schwartz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.