Coca-Cola Co. v. Dorris
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
311 F. Supp. 287 (1970)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Ed Dorris (defendant) did business as Dorris House #1 and Dorris House #2 (collectively, Dorris House) in Pine Bluff, Arkansas. The Coca-Cola Company (Coca-Cola) (plaintiff) brought a trademark-infringement action against Dorris in federal district court, alleging that Dorris had substituted and passed off other beverages as Coca-Cola’s products to customers at Dorris House. Coca-Cola alleged that it sold its products worldwide under the registered trademarks Coca-Cola and Coke. Coca-Cola claimed that between 1966 and 1968, when customers had ordered Coke or Coca-Cola at Dorris House, Dorris House employees had substituted another similar-looking beverage a total of 24 times without informing the customer that the beverage was being substituted. During some instances of substitution, Dorris House employees confirmed verbally or in writing that customers wanted and were purportedly being given Coke or Coca-Cola. Coca-Cola representatives advised Dorris in person and by letter that Dorris’s actions were infringing on Coca-Cola’s trademarks. However, Dorris’s beverage substitutions continued even after those warnings. Dorris asserted that he had posted a sign at Dorris House #1 stating that Dorris House did not serve Coke or Coca-Cola and instead served Dorris House Cola. Dorris also claimed that he had told his employees to tell customers ordering Coke or Coca-Cola that Dorris House served Dorris House Cola. However, evidence showed that the employees had not followed those instructions. Dorris also produced witnesses who claimed that they knew Dorris House did not serve Coca-Cola and had heard Dorris House employees tell customers about Dorris House Cola. However, those witnesses could not give precise information about when they heard those conversations. Coca-Cola sought a permanent injunction prohibiting Dorris from further infringing on Coca-Cola’s trademarks and passing off other beverages as Coke or Coca-Cola.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harris, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.