Coca-Cola Co. v. Purdy
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
382 F.3d 774 (2004)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
William Purdy (defendant) registered numerous Internet domain names that incorporated distinctive, famous, and protected marks owned by the Coca-Cola Company and others (collectively, trademark owners) (plaintiffs), including drinkcoke.org, mymcdonalds.com, and my-washingtonpost.com. Purdy linked the domain names to the website abortionismurder.com, which contained anti-abortion messaging and graphic images of aborted fetuses. Purdy’s website also contained links to another site that solicited donations and sold merchandise bearing anti-abortion messages. Purdy did not appear to have targeted the companies he did because of any position they had taken on abortion but rather for the purpose of engendering confusion and diverting the companies’ users to his websites in order to tarnish the owners’ marks. Purdy also offered to stop using the Washington Post Company domain name in exchange for space on the newspaper’s editorial page. The trademark owners filed suit under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. The district court entered a preliminary injunction in favor of the trademark owners, and Purdy appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.