Cochran v. Burger King Corporation

937 S.W.2d 358 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cochran v. Burger King Corporation

Missouri Court of Appeals
937 S.W.2d 358 (1996)

Facts

Chad Cochran (plaintiff) got drunk at a friend’s house, was hungry, and walked across the street to a Hardee’s. To get to the Hardee’s, Cochran crossed the parking lot of a Burger King (defendant). The Burger King was closed. Its exterior lights were off, and there was no activity inside. A half hour later, Cochran made a second food run, again crossing the Burger King parking lot. When Cochran arrived at Hardee’s he realized he’d forgotten his money. He started walking back to the friend’s house. As he crossed the Burger King parking lot, Cochran decided to check the Burger King dumpster for food. The dumpster was in an enclosure of three brick walls and a wooden gate. The dumpster area was meant for use only by Burger King employees, not the public. Unbeknownst to Cochran, but known to Burger King’s employees and manager, one of the brick walls was weak, damaged, and unstable. The top of the wall had become disconnected from the bottom of the wall due to a trash truck hitting it a month earlier. Cochran tried to climb the damaged wall. The wall collapsed, severely injuring Cochran. His left thumb and left leg had to be amputated. Cochran sued, claiming Burger King breached its duty to keep its premises in a safe condition. Burger King argued that it had no duty to Cochran because Cochran was a trespasser. The trial court found in favor of Cochran. Burger King appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Smart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership