Coker v. Georgia
United States Supreme Court
433 U.S. 584, 97 S. Ct. 2861, 53 L. Ed. 2d 982 (1977)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
On September 2, 1974, Ehrlich Coker (defendant) escaped from a Georgia prison where he had been serving time for various felonies, including murder, rape, kidnapping, and aggravated assault. That night, Coker entered the home of Allen and Elnita Carver. Coker threatened both of them, tied up Allen, and took Allen’s money and keys and a knife from the kitchen. Coker proceeded to rape Elnita and then drove her away in Allen’s car. Allen managed to free himself and alert police, who quickly detained Coker. Coker was charged with a number of offenses, including the rape of Elnita. Under Georgia law, rape was an offense punishable by death if accompanied by certain aggravating circumstances, as defined by statute. Accordingly, the jury was instructed that it could consider imposing the death penalty if it found that Coker had a prior conviction for a capital felony or if it found that the rape was committed during the commission of another capital felony. The jury found that both aggravating circumstances existed, because Coker had previously been convicted of capital felonies and because the rape occurred during the commission of an armed robbery. The jury sentenced Coker to death for the rape. The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Powell, J.)
Dissent (Burger, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
