Colavito v. New York Organ Donor Network, Inc.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
8 N.Y.3d 43, 860 N.E.2d 713 (2006)
- Written by Rocco Sainato, JD
Facts
In 2002, Colavito (plaintiff) was suffering from end-stage kidney failure, with his only hope for survival being a kidney transplant. A good friend of Colavito passed away during this time and donated his kidneys to him. The New York Organ Donor Network (defendant) determined they would be a sufficient match for Colavito, and shipped one to his hospital. Upon its arrival, the medical staff at Colavito’s hospital determined that the kidney they received was not suitable for transplantation, and called New York Organ Donor Network for the other kidney. Colavito’s medical staff was then informed that the remaining kidney had already been given to another recipient. It was later determined that the kidneys would not have been a suitable match for Colavito, and would have been rejected by his body immediately. Nonetheless, Colavito brought suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, claiming fraud, conversion, and violations of New York Public Health Law. The court ruled in favor of New York Organ Donor Network. Colavito then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which determined that the fraud claim failed, but that the conversion and public health law claims were issues to be determined by New York state law. The Second Circuit certified to the Court of Appeals of the State of New York, which accepted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rosenblatt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.