Cole v. JNO. M. Oakey, Inc.

101 Va. Cir. 288 (2019)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cole v. JNO. M. Oakey, Inc.

Virginia Circuit Court
101 Va. Cir. 288 (2019)

KL
Play video

Facts

Traci Lynn Cole (plaintiff) entered into a contract with JNO. M. Oakey, Inc. (Oakey) (defendant), a company that provided cremation and funeral services. The contract obligated Oakey to provide cremation services for the remains of Traci Lynn’s husband. The contract specified that the cremated remains should be returned to Carolyn Cunningham, a friend of Traci Lynn’s, or Jessica Cole, Traci Lynn’s stepdaughter. Traci Lynn allegedly had a conversation with Oakey employees about her desire for the return of her husband’s cremated remains. However, two urns containing all of the cremated remains were returned to Jessica, who refused to give Traci Lynn any of the remains. Traci Lynn filed a complaint against Oakey, asserting that Oakey had violated the contract by returning both urns to Jessica. Traci Lynn argued that, based on the contract and the discussion she had with Oakey employees, one urn was to be given to Cunningham and the other was to be given to Jessica. Traci Lynn argued that the partial-integration doctrine applied because the contract, which did not specify how many urns each person should receive, was incomplete. Therefore, Traci Lynn argued, the evidence of her conversation with Oakey employees should be considered. Oakey filed a demurrer, arguing that the parol-evidence rule precluded consideration of evidence of Traci Lynn’s conversation with Oakey employees to supply terms of the contract.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Clemens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership