Supreme Court of Connecticut
136 A.2d 744 (1957)
Cole (plaintiff) executed a contract to purchase real estate situated in Connecticut from Steinlauf (defendant). The contract provided that Cole could withdraw from the sale and be reimbursed expenses if Steinlauf was unable to provide clear title. A title search revealed that the language of the deed given to Steinlauf by his predecessor conveyed title to Steinlauf “and assigns forever,” but did not include the word “heirs.” Upon the advice of an attorney, Cole reneged on the purchase and demanded the return of deposit money and reimbursement of expenses for the title search. Steinlauf declined and Cole brought suit for monetary damages. The trial court concluded that the deed, although technically defective, effectively conferred title in fee absolute upon Steinlauf and ruled against Cole. Cole appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wynne, C.J.)
Concurrence (Baldwin, A.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.