Coleman v. Frierson

607 F. Supp. 1566, aff'd sub nom. Coleman v. Smith, 814 F.2d 1142 (1987)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Coleman v. Frierson

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
607 F. Supp. 1566, aff'd sub nom. Coleman v. Smith, 814 F.2d 1142 (1987)

Play video

Facts

In 1982, Samuel Coleman (plaintiff), a special investigator for the Village of Robbins, was authorized to investigate police corruption that indicated the mayor’s involvement. Coleman was later fired as part of a cover-up. Coleman sued the Village of Robbins, its police chief, and its mayor (defendants), alleging that they violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights. More than a year after Coleman filed the complaint, the judge imposed a default judgment as to the defendants’ liability because of their willful delinquency during discovery. The jury subsequently awarded Coleman a verdict for over a half million dollars in damages. The court entered judgment on the verdict. The defendants appealed from the court’s judgment

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shadur, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership