Coleman v. Hoffman
Washington Court of Appeals
115 Wash.App. 853, 64 P.3d 65 (2003)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Roberta Coleman (plaintiff) lived in an apartment complex owned by David Brown and Steve Clem. OCI (defendant) secured a loan for Brown and Clem. Anderson Hunter (defendant), a law firm, financed the loan. Brown and Clem defaulted on the loan, and Anderson Hunter instituted judicial foreclosure proceedings. At that point, OCI began collecting rents from tenants at the apartment complex and forwarding the rents to Anderson Hunter. Anderson Hunter also began paying the complex’s utilities and repair costs. Anderson Hunter hired Craig Hoffman (defendant) to maintain the complex. Upon his hire, Hoffman fired the existing apartment manager. Subsequently, Coleman’s daughter was injured due to a faulty railing in the complex. Coleman brought a premises liability suit against the defendants. Coleman argued the defendants were liable because they were mortgagees in possession of the complex. The trial court granted summary judgment to all defendants. Coleman appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bridgewater, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.