Colfax Envelope Corp. v. Local No. 458-3M

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
20 F.3d 750 (1994)


Colfax Envelope Corp. (Colfax) (plaintiff) hired employees to operate its two printing presses. These employees were represented by Local No. 458-3M (the union) (defendant). Previously, the union would negotiate a collective bargaining agreement with the Chicago Lithographers Association (CLA) and send a summary of the terms to Colfax for approval. If Colfax did not agree with those terms, it had the right to negotiate separately. The collective bargaining agreement set the minimum manning requirements for each type of printing press. Colfax had two presses that were 78 inches wide and, under the existing collective bargaining agreement, had to be manned by four employees each. When a summary of the newest changes to the agreement was sent to Colfax, the summary listed one of the manning requirements as “4C 60 Press-3 Men,” which Colfax interpreted as requiring presses 60 inches or wider to be manned by 3 employees. Finding this advantageous, Colfax agreed to the changes in the summary. Upon receiving the final agreement, Colfax learned that “4C 60 Press-3 Men” meant 3 men were required for presses of 60 inches or less. Colfax sought a declaration stating that no collective bargaining agreement was created due to lack of agreement on an essential term. The union sought to compel arbitration because the agreement contained an arbitration clause. The trial court granted summary judgment finding that the summary unambiguously referred to 60-inch presses. Colfax appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is for members only. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.


The issue section is for members only and includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section is for members only and includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Here's why 10,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 7,548 briefs - keyed to 85 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now