Collard v. Incorp. Village of Flower Hill

421 N.E.2d 818 (1981)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Collard v. Incorp. Village of Flower Hill

Court of Appeals of New York
421 N.E.2d 818 (1981)

  • Written by Patrick Busch, JD

Facts

Collard (plaintiff) owns property in the Village of Flower Hill (Village) (defendant). In 1976, previous owners of the property asked the Village to rezone it so that it could be used for business purposes. The Village agreed, on the condition that the owners execute a covenant that there would be no construction of new buildings on the property without the Village’s consent. There was no provision that consent would not be unreasonably withheld. The owners executed the covenant, and the Village rezoned the property. Collard acquired the property in 1978, and asked the Village to approve an enlargement of the structures on the property. The Village refused, and gave no reason for doing so. Collard brought suit against the Village, claiming that its refusal was arbitrary, unreasonable, and unconstitutional. He sought an order directing the Village to permit new construction. The lower courts dismissed Collard’s claim, and he appealed to the state supreme court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Land Use
Property

Key Terms