Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court
882 P.2d 894 (1994)


Facts

Laura and Richard Crowell (plaintiffs) were married. Laura suffered from agoraphobia and other panic disorders. Laura sought treatment from College Hospital, Inc. (Hospital) (defendant). Laura met Hospital employee Robert Berry during her treatment and became involved in an extramarital affair with him. Laura claimed both that Berry manipulated her and that the Hospital’s therapists encouraged the relationship. Berry eventually ended the affair. Laura suffered a breakdown and was admitted to a different psychiatric institution. Laura and Richard sued the Hospital. In the complaint, Laura alleged that the Hospital knew about: (1) a prior relationship between Berry and another patient and (2) the relationship between Berry and Laura. The complaint also alleged that the Hospital did not warn Laura about Berry’s propensity for relationships with patients. The Crowells filed a motion to amend their complaint to state a punitive-damages claim. The proposed amended complaint did not contain any additional facts, but it did include a declaration from Laura swearing to the same facts that were in the original complaint. The trial court granted the motion to amend. The Hospital appealed to the California Court of Appeal, which affirmed. The Hospital then petitioned the California Supreme Court for review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Baxter, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.