Collins Foods International, Inc. v. INS

948 F.2d 549 (1991)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Collins Foods International, Inc. v. INS

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
948 F.2d 549 (1991)

  • Written by Christopher Bova, JD

Facts

Collins (defendant) operates the Sizzler chain of restaurants. Soto, an employee at a Sizzler restaurant in Arizona, offered a job to Rodriguez after a phone interview. Soto asked Rodriguez to provide him with documentation proving his work authorization before he could start working. Rodriguez provided a driver’s license and a Social Security card. Soto copied the information onto the standard form and Rodriguez began working. Soto did not try to verify the authenticity of the documents in any way. The Social Security card turned out to be forged and Rodriguez was not actually authorized to work in the United States. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) charged Collins with knowingly hiring an alien who is not authorized to work in the United States in violation of section 274A(a)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The administrative law judge ruled against Collins, finding that it had constructive knowledge of Rodriguez’s unauthorized status. Collins appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Canby, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership