Colombia—Measures Relating to the Importation of Textiles, Apparel and Footwear
World Trade Organization
WT/DS461/AB/R (2016)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
Colombia (defendant) instituted compound tariffs on various textile, apparel, and footwear products imported from Panama (plaintiff). Panama filed a complaint with the World Trade Organization (WTO) alleging that the tariffs violated the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Colombia justified the tariffs by contending that the products were being sold at artificially low prices to support money-laundering schemes. Colombia claimed that, therefore, the tariffs met a GATT exception allowing tariffs to protect public morals. The WTO panel held that Colombia had failed to demonstrate that the tariffs were designed for a protective moral purpose—to impede money laundering. Colombia appealed to the WTO’s appellate body.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.