Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Colonial Life Insurance Co. of America v. Curiale

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department
617 N.Y.S.2d 377 (1994)


Facts

As New York’s Superintendent of Insurance, Curiale (defendant) promulgated two insurance regulations designed to carry out provisions of Chapter 501 of the Laws of 1992. Chapter 501 required insurance companies in the state to employ a community standard and to offer open enrollment when issuing policies. The two regulations, parts 360 and 361 of 11 NYCRR, established a risk-sharing pool system in seven geographic regions. This pool distributed funds to insurers with worse than average demographic factors and required insurers with above average demographic factors to pay into the pool. Colonial Life Insurance Company (plaintiff) issued small group policies in the state. It commenced an action seeking to have both regulations invalidated. It claimed that the pool system established by part 361 imposed an unconstitutional tax and was a taking of property without just compensation. It also claimed that the Legislature did not intend for payments to the pool system to be mandatory and be based on existing policies. The supreme court dismissed Colonial’s petition as to part 361 but granted the petition as to part 360. The court determined that specific sections of part 360 exceeded the scope of the authority delegated to Curiale by Chapter 501. Both parties then cross-appealed from the trial court’s judgment.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Peters, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.