Colorado Real Estate Commission v. Vizzi
Colorado Court of Appeals
488 P.3d 470 (2019)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
John Vizzi (defendant), a licensed real estate broker, contracted with clients to perform unbundled services—that is, limited services like listing property for sale, as opposed to assisting with the entirety of the transaction. Vizzi was subject to an anonymous complaint and charged by the Colorado Real Estate Commission (the commission) (plaintiff) with failing to fulfill his duties under the state law governing real estate brokers. The law classified brokers as either single agents (representing one party in a transaction) or transaction brokers (the default classification for all other licensed brokers). The law also included an articulation of policy goals as well as a procedure for investigation of alleged violations. An administrative-law judge held that Vizzi, as a transaction broker, was required to perform various duties—including advisement and negotiation, among others—throughout a real estate transaction. The commission adopted these findings in a final agency order. Vizzi appealed, arguing that the stated duties were not mandatory. Vizzi also argued that the commission’s policy violated federal antitrust law because three out of five commission members were real estate brokers, thus constituting illegal domination by market participants.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Terry, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.