Colorado v. New Mexico II
United States Supreme Court
467 U.S. 310 (1984)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Historically, nobody in Colorado (plaintiff) had ever used the water from the Vermejo River before it reached New Mexico (defendant). New Mexicans diverted and used the water for many years, and a 1941 decree apportioned the water rights among them. In 1975, a Colorado steel company obtained a conditional right to divert water from the river in Colorado state court. The New Mexico users with senior rights sued and successfully enjoined the diversion. Colorado filed an original complaint in the Supreme Court requesting an equitable apportionment for an interim agricultural use and five other possible permanent uses. Colorado claimed New Mexico used water from the Vermejo wastefully and inefficiently and that if the New Mexico users adopted “a closed stock and domestic water system,” it could save 2,000 acre-feet annually. The special master recommended permitting the diversion, reasoning New Mexico could offset its effects through reasonable conservation measures and that the benefits to Colorado would outweigh any injury to New Mexico. The Supreme Court found consideration of those factors appropriate, but the special master had not clearly stated factual findings in support of his recommendation. The Court remanded directing the special master to detail five specific factual findings. The special master prepared additional findings explaining his belief that more careful water administration in New Mexico would alleviate any shortages that Colorado’s proposed diversion might cause and that inefficient uses in New Mexico “should not be charged to Colorado.” New Mexico filed exceptions objecting to the report and additional factual findings.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.