From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...
Colorado v. Spring
United States Supreme Court
479 U.S. 564 (1987)
ATF agents received a tip that Spring (defendant) was illegally selling firearms and that he was involved in a murder. An agent set up a sting and purchased firearms from Spring. After federal agents arrested Spring, they read him his Miranda rights and he signed a written waiver. They asked him about the firearms deal, and then asked Spring if he had ever shot anyone. He stated that he had “shot [a] guy once.” Subsequently, federal agents questioned Spring again, and during this questioning, he confessed to the murder. The trial court convicted Spring. The Colorado Supreme Court reversed, finding that the agents’ reading of the Miranda rights was invalid because they did not tell Spring the scope of the upcoming questioning. Specifically, the agents did not tell Spring that they would be asking him about whether he shot someone. The result, according to the Colorado Supreme Court, was that the subsequent confession was inadmissible. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.