Colthurst v. Lake View State Bank
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
18 F.2d 875 (1927)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The Lake View State Bank of Chicago (bank) (plaintiff) sued Colthurst (defendant) to recover the principal and interest on Colthurst's debt. The debt was evidenced by a note, signed by Colthurst, obtained from the note's previous holder. The bank produced testimony that it was a holder of the note in due course. Colthurst argued the note was fraudulent and that the bank did not hold it in due course. The trial judge refused to allow Colthurst to introduce evidence of fraud unless Colthurst could first introduce evidence that the bank did not hold the note in due course. Later, the judge ruled Colthurst's only evidence on the due course issue was inadmissible, and consequently directed a verdict for the bank. Colthurst appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which disposed of two threshold matters before addressing the issue in the case.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Otto, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.