Columbia River Fishermen's Protective Union v. City of St. Helens

87 P.2d 195 (1939)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Columbia River Fishermen’s Protective Union v. City of St. Helens

Oregon Supreme Court
87 P.2d 195 (1939)

Facts

The Columbia Fishermen’s Protective Union (the fishermen) (plaintiff) was a group of fishermen that fished in waters downstream from where the city of St. Helens (the city) (defendant) discharged sewage, chemicals, and waste matter. The waters into which the city dumped its sewage were home to large populations of salmon, and the fishing industry in that area had grown in scope and value over many years. The fishermen claimed that the sewage released by the city damaged or destroyed the water and the fishermen’s nets, as well as the wildlife within the water, resulting in a decreased salmon population. The fishermen sued the city and requested an injunction, claiming that the injury to their property and livelihood was significant and irreparable. The city filed a demurrer, claiming that the fishermen were not authorized to maintain the action. The county circuit court dismissed the action, and the fishermen appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bean, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership