Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
499 U.S. 365 (1991)


Facts

Columbia Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (COA) (defendant), maintained a billboard business in the City of Columbia, South Carolina (the city) (defendant). COA had been a staple of the Columbia community for many years, and COA had strong relationships with local political leaders, including members of the city council. In 1981, Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (Omni) (plaintiff), decided to enter the South Carolina market and began putting up billboards in Columbia. By then, COA enjoyed a 95 percent share of the market. Competition between Omni and COA escalated, and eventually COA met with city officials to establish new billboard regulations. In 1982, the city enacted an ordinance that restricted the location, dimensions, and apportionment of billboards within the city. Because COA already had billboards in place, the ordinance had a significant effect on Omni’s, but not COA’s, ability to compete. Omni responded by bringing an action against the defendants, alleging antitrust violations under the Sherman Act. Omni argued that the defendants had conspired with anticompetitive intent and were not entitled to antitrust immunity under the state-action doctrine. A jury returned a verdict for Omni and awarded damages, but the district court granted the city’s motion to overturn the verdict. The court of appeals reversed the district court’s judgment and reinstated the jury verdict. The defendants appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.