Colvin v. Derwinski

1 Vet. App. 171 (1991)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Colvin v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1 Vet. App. 171 (1991)

Facts

Colvin (plaintiff) was a Vietnam War veteran who had been wounded three times during the war. In addition to these wounds, Colvin had experienced other medical complications during the war and within the two years following his discharge from the military. When Colvin eventually developed multiple sclerosis, he claimed a service connection for the diagnosis, alleging that the other medical conditions he had experienced during and shortly after his service had been medical precursors to the disease. The Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA) (defendant) denied his initial claim, and the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) upheld that denial upon review. In so holding, the BVA found that there was no medical evidence that Colvin had shown characteristic manifestations of multiple sclerosis during his active duty period or within the seven-year presumptive period. Two years later, Colvin submitted a request to reopen his claim on the basis of new evidence. This evidence consisted of testimony from doctors who asserted that Colvin’s diagnosis was in fact service connected. After his claim was denied, Colvin appealed the decision to the BVA. The BVA upheld the denial, asserting that the medical conditions Colvin had experienced were not related to his later multiple-sclerosis diagnosis, but without providing any supporting medical evidence. Colvin appealed the BVA’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holdaway, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership