Comerica, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Company
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
498 F. Supp. 2d 1019 (2007)
- Written by Genan Zilkha, JD
Facts
Comerica, Inc. (Comerica) (plaintiff) had two insurance policies. Comerica’s primary insurance policy was with Federal Insurance Company (FIC). This policy had a $20 million limit on liability. Comerica had an excess-insurance policy with Zurich American Insurance Company (Zurich) (defendant). Coverage under the Zurich policy was triggered “after all such ‘Underlying Insurance’ has been reduced or exhausted by payments for losses.” Comerica settled five class-action lawsuits for $21 million. FIC paid $14 million towards this settlement. Comerica paid the remaining $7 million. Comerica then sought $1 million and the cost of defense, $2.6 million, from Zurich under the excess-insurance policy. Zurich refused to pay the amounts Comerica sought, because Zurich claimed, Comerica had not exhausted FIC’s $20 million primary-insurance limit. Comerica claimed that FIC’s $20 million primary-insurance limit was exhausted when Comerica paid the difference between the $14 million FIC paid and the $20 million insurance limit. Zurich moved for summary judgment, and Comerica moved for partial summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lawson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.