Commercial Resource Group, LLC v. The J.M. Smucker Co.
United States Court of Appeal, Eighth Circuit
753 F.3d 790 (2014)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
The J.M. Smucker Co. (defendant) leased a commercial building in North Dakota from Commercial Resource Group, LLC (CRG) (plaintiff). After an initial period, the lease would automatically renew for one-year periods on January 1. However, the lease also gave Smucker the option to terminate the lease early if it provided notice to a listed address before the January 1 renewal date. Several years into the lease, CRG sent written notice to Smucker that “all future rent payments and lease correspondence” should be sent to a new address. Smucker then sent rent payments to the new address. Later, Smucker decided that it wanted to terminate the lease. On December 22, Smucker sent written notice of its intent to terminate the lease via FedEx, but Smucker sent it to CRG’s old address. On December 23 and 30, FedEx sent emails to Smucker that the notice was undeliverable at the listed address. On January 4, Smucker sent a second lease-termination notice to CRG’s correct address. CRG received this notice on January 5. The parties disagreed about whether this second notice was too late to terminate the lease, and the dispute ended up in federal district court. The district court found that: (1) time was not of the essence for the lease’s deadline to cancel the lease, (2) Smucker had substantially performed its obligation to notify CRG of its lease cancelation, and (3) CRG had not been prejudiced by the delay. Based on these findings, the district court ruled that Smucker had not materially breached the lease and had effectively canceled it. CRG appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kelly, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.