Commission of the European Communities v. Ireland

[1993] 1 CMLR 320 (1992)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Commission of the European Communities v. Ireland

European Court of Justice
[1993] 1 CMLR 320 (1992)

Facts

European Council Directive 87/328 (directive) required European Economic Community (EEC) member states to accept pure-bred bovines for breeding purposes by January 1, 1989. Ireland (defendant) did not meet this deadline. The Commission of the European Communities (commission) (plaintiff) sued Ireland, seeking a declaration that Ireland had failed to implement the directive. Ireland conceded that it had not enacted legislation to implement the directive but argued that it was observing the directive in practice. The commission responded that Ireland was required to adopt legislation to implement the directive. The advocate general recommended that the court rule for the commission on the ground that mere administrative practices were inherently alterable at will by the authorities, were not publicized appropriately, and thus were insufficient to satisfy an EEC member state’s obligation to implement a European Council directive.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership